AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

Previous Message Next Message
Message List New Topic Print View
|
gang
September 20, 2012 02:31PM
SL Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I didn't get the second half of the following
> page. You meant it as the documentation on your
> website about 3dLME
> (http://afni.nimh.nih.gov/sscc/gangc/lme.html)?

Sorry, I forgot to include web page. Yes, that's what I was referring to.

> Also, in the case of having more contrasts - 2
> groups of participants and 2x2 within-Ss
> conditions (i.e., 2 types of stimuli of one
> category) - 3dLME is still the best way to
> approach?

If you have two within-subject factors, then GroupAna, although not ideal in this case, is probably the only option right now.

Gang
Reply Quote
RSS
Subject Author Posted

3dANOVA3 with unbalanced sample size

SL September 18, 2012 06:01PM

Re: 3dANOVA3 with unbalanced sample size

gang September 19, 2012 10:19AM

Re: 3dANOVA3 with unbalanced sample size

SL September 19, 2012 01:19PM

Re: 3dANOVA3 with unbalanced sample size

gang September 19, 2012 04:23PM

Re: 3dANOVA3 with unbalanced sample size

SL September 20, 2012 10:12AM

Re: 3dANOVA3 with unbalanced sample size

gang September 20, 2012 02:31PM

Re: 3dANOVA3 with unbalanced sample size

SL September 20, 2012 04:06PM