AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
April 15, 2013 12:14PM
Hi Joseph,

Some ringing will occur with censoring if you just drop samples and use FFT-based methods. Such filters do not play well with censored data because they assume the time series were uniformly sampled. Our preferred approach is to do the filtering and censoring with the same model using linear regression. That is the approach used by afni_proc.py.

For your use of 3dBandpass, I take it you are replacing censored points with the average of the neighbors, as Carp suggested in his commentary in Neuroimage, and that is OK too.

In general, unless you are censoring a considerable chunk of your data, the differences due to filtering should have little effect on your final group comparison.

cheers,
Ziad
Subject Author Posted

3dBandpass filter's "name"

Anonymous User January 03, 2013 03:01PM

Re: 3dBandpass filter's "name"

ptaylor January 04, 2013 03:30AM

Re: 3dBandpass filter's "name"

Bob Cox January 09, 2013 07:20AM

Re: 3dBandpass filter's "name"

JoJo January 10, 2013 11:55AM

Re: 3dBandpass filter's "name"

jdviviano April 02, 2013 12:58AM

Re: 3dBandpass filter's "name"

ziad April 15, 2013 12:14PM