AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
May 08, 2013 06:23PM
Chris,

So you want to see whether the coupling at a few regions under one condition is different under another condition? If the trials vary between 8.5-10 seconds, it's probably not going to make much different the duration difference is less than a TR, but dmBLOCK with -stim_times_AM1 would not hurt either.

I don't have a better suggestion, but maybe you could try:

1) run the typical regression analysis with 3dDeconvolve with option -cbucket, then use the following to isolate those effects you want to remove from the signal,

3dSynthesize -cbucket CbucketFileFrom3dDeconvolve+orig -matrix x1DFrom3dDeconvolve -select ... prefix EffectsOfNoInterest

and finally obtain the signal corresponding to the specific condition:

3dcalc -a InputFor3Deconvolve -b EffectsOfNoInterest -expr 'a-b' -prefix CleanData

This is not ideal because, as I mentioned before, the trial-to-trial variability can't fully modeled. Plus the assumed HDR function is also a crude approximation.

2) PPI is slightly different from what you're looking for (and it's also a very crude approach), but it may be worth trying?

Gang
Subject Author Posted

Regression for Correlation Matrix

Anonymous User April 30, 2013 06:29PM

Re: Regression for Correlation Matrix

gang May 01, 2013 12:24PM

Re: Regression for Correlation Matrix

Anonymous User May 02, 2013 06:21PM

Re: Regression for Correlation Matrix

Anonymous User May 07, 2013 02:42AM

Re: Regression for Correlation Matrix

gang May 07, 2013 12:16PM

Re: Regression for Correlation Matrix

Anonymous User May 07, 2013 06:34PM

Re: Regression for Correlation Matrix

gang May 08, 2013 06:23PM

Re: Regression for Correlation Matrix

Anonymous User May 13, 2013 08:00PM

Re: Regression for Correlation Matrix

rick reynolds May 14, 2013 09:45AM