AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

Previous Message Next Message
Message List New Topic Print View
|
gsudre
May 08, 2013 01:34PM
Hello,

I'm new to AFNI and I have recently inherited a good amount of resting state fMRI data. I'm trying to replicate the analysis in Gotts et al. 2012, and the data was acquired at NIH. I do have physiological data for most of the subjects, and plan to use RetroTS to obtain regressors.

After visually checking some of the .1D files for respiratory and EKG data, some of them look quite noisy (e.g. maybe faulty sensor, bad placement, etc). I was wondering how RetroTS handles noisy physiological recordings, and if you advise visual quality control of the physiological data, along with the usual QC that is required for the fMRI data. If so, what would the recommendations be?

Thanks,

Gustavo
Reply Quote
RSS
Subject Author Posted

RetroTS and quality of physiological data

gsudre May 08, 2013 01:34PM

Re: RetroTS and quality of physiological data

Steve Gotts May 08, 2013 04:42PM

Re: RetroTS and quality of physiological data

Isaac Schwabacher May 08, 2013 05:31PM

Re: RetroTS and quality of physiological data

gsudre May 08, 2013 06:01PM