AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
June 28, 2013 05:15PM
The problem, I believe, is that there are such few voxels in the mask (94 voxels) that random noise generated in the alignment process's masking matches the data well, and this is sensitive to these changes in the constraints. The optimization will continue to find the minimum cost. You can see what that cost is by using "-verb". The "-twopass" option is a solution for avoiding local minima, but with the small ROI and random noise, it would be "fooled" by the noise. I found good results that are less sensitive to the shift limits by using the "-nomask" option that should avoid the random noise masking. Also, using "@Align_Centers -cm" makes for a good starting point.
Subject Author Posted

affine spinal cord registration

Robert Barry June 13, 2013 01:24PM

Re: affine spinal cord registration

Daniel Glen June 14, 2013 04:47PM

Re: affine spinal cord registration

Robert Barry June 25, 2013 11:25AM

Re: affine spinal cord registration

Robert Barry June 27, 2013 03:16PM

Re: affine spinal cord registration

Daniel Glen June 28, 2013 05:15PM

Re: affine spinal cord registration

Robert Barry July 01, 2013 12:04PM