History of AFNI updates  

|
July 10, 2013 10:39AM
Hi Bob,
Thanks! That is a very interesting idea. I read their protocol a bit but did not realize they were doing in this way. I agree with you that the field map result is semi-reasonable. For some parts it seems to make the EPI match structure better, but for some other parts it can over compensate (if I am not doing things wrong) and the performance seems to vary with subjects.

I will give a try for my future scans. So if my scan is A>>P phase encoding direction, should I just add a few TRs of scan with P>>A phase encoding direction?

Mingbo
Subject Author Posted

One way to incorporate FSL field map correction

Mingbo July 09, 2013 02:41PM

Re: One way to incorporate FSL field map correction

Mingbo July 09, 2013 02:44PM

Re: One way to incorporate FSL field map correction

Bob Cox July 10, 2013 09:56AM

Re: One way to incorporate FSL field map correction

Mingbo July 10, 2013 10:39AM

Re: One way to incorporate FSL field map correction

Phil Burton April 14, 2014 02:18PM

Re: One way to incorporate FSL field map correction

Emperor Zhark April 15, 2014 07:11PM

Re: One way to incorporate FSL field map correction

Phil Burton April 16, 2014 06:05PM

Re: One way to incorporate FSL field map correction

jkeidel December 09, 2014 09:31AM

Re: One way to incorporate FSL field map correction

jkeidel November 28, 2014 09:29AM

Re: One way to incorporate FSL field map correction

maria April 29, 2015 01:16PM

Re: One way to incorporate FSL field map correction

jmbjork January 12, 2017 08:17AM

Re: One way to incorporate FSL field map correction

rick reynolds January 12, 2017 09:31AM

Re: One way to incorporate FSL field map correction

jmbjork January 25, 2017 11:26AM

Re: One way to incorporate FSL field map correction

rick reynolds January 25, 2017 11:41AM

Re: One way to incorporate FSL field map correction

Cecil C. Yen April 05, 2017 05:04PM