AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

Previous Message Next Message
Message List New Topic Print View
|
qiuhai
February 28, 2014 04:47PM
Hi rick,

Thank for your suggestion.
If we try in this way, there are both trial-level random (within individual blocks) and block-level random (across whole runs). And I think this would take much time to do the iteration evaluation procedure. In fact, what I want to make is similar to ordinary ER-design, with only one restriction that the same number of trials for one factor are grouped together.
However, I will try it out. Thank you though, rick!

Best,
Qiuhai
Reply Quote
RSS
Subject Author Posted

creating and evaluating timing files in mixed design

qiuhai February 25, 2014 08:01PM

Re: creating and evaluating timing files in mixed design

rick reynolds February 27, 2014 04:43PM

Re: creating and evaluating timing files in mixed design

qiuhai February 28, 2014 04:47PM