AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
March 12, 2014 09:46AM
Hi Jason,

I'll compliment Nick's reply with some historical perspective. Way back when we developed MapIcosahedron, we used ld141 because the vast majority of edges were smaller than those of the densest surfaces we used, those from FreeSurfer. So, the idea there is to preserve any detail present in the original meshes. To get information about the mesh you are viewing in suma, open the surface controller and click on 'More' under surface properties. The info is more for debugging purposes, but it will do for the occasional parameter. Otherwise you're better off with command line tools such as those in PyMVPA or the Surf* programs in AFNI. Depending on the amounts of distortions in the sphere.reg some edges can be considerably longer than the average in the standard meshes, so there is some risk of undersampling in those regions. For most analyses, particularly FMRI, ld141 is overkill. But because we estimate the smoothness of the data (SurfSmooth) in our analyses (the noise in the data to be precise), oversampling is not an issue. It is just more processing time, and as Nick points out, the meshes look better.

cheers,
Ziad
Subject Author Posted

Effective resolution of surface datasets

jason-avery March 11, 2014 03:42PM

Re: Effective resolution of surface datasets

nick March 12, 2014 08:12AM

Re: Effective resolution of surface datasets

ziad March 12, 2014 09:46AM

Re: Effective resolution of surface datasets

jason-avery March 12, 2014 05:28PM