AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
April 07, 2014 04:19PM
In the current study in my lab, we are having a difficult time obtaining significant results from a group analysis of older adults. We have examined the data in multiple ways and have come to the conclusion that there is definitely per-subject activation but when the subjects are grouped, the variability in the data results in zero significant clusters. I understand that in order to find significance, there must be many people with activation in the same region, but how do we examine the data of older adults who are likely recruiting various brain regions to complete a task?

Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated!

Thanks!
Subject Author Posted

Dealing with variability within a group of older adults

adjacobson1 April 07, 2014 04:19PM

Re: Dealing with variability within a group of older adults

gang April 08, 2014 10:22AM

Re: Dealing with variability within a group of older adults

adjacobson1 April 08, 2014 01:50PM