Yes, we do not see statistically significant results at the seed region in the group output for either a) the interaction coefficient, or b) the seed time series coefficient. Does that make sense?
Aside from our confusion over not seeing group level statistical significance for b (e.g., seed time series before psychological interaction) in our seed region, I am *very* happy with the whole analysis! I just want to make sure that we're not doing something wrong simply because we don't see significance in our seed region in the group level seed_ts coefficient.
Thank you again!
