History of AFNI updates  

|
August 25, 2014 03:42PM
I recommend that you use 1dSVAR instead of 1dSEM:

[afni.nimh.nih.gov]

> My output yielded path coefficients within the -8 and 8 range. Maybe I ran something wrong
> because most of the papers I've seen report within the -1 1 range.

The path coefficient can be any value. For its interpretation, see page 1151 in the following paper:

[www.sciencedirect.com]

Gang
Subject Author Posted

Effective connectivity using 1dSEM

O.M. August 25, 2014 02:19PM

Re: Effective connectivity using 1dSEM

gang August 25, 2014 03:42PM

Re: Effective connectivity using 1dSEM

O.M. August 25, 2014 05:45PM

Re: Effective connectivity using 1dSEM

O.M. August 26, 2014 10:52AM

Re: Effective connectivity using 1dSEM

gang August 27, 2014 09:46AM

Re: Effective connectivity using 1dSEM

O.M. August 27, 2014 11:20AM

Re: Effective connectivity using 1dSEM

gang August 27, 2014 01:01PM

Re: Effective connectivity using 1dSEM

O.M. August 27, 2014 01:15PM

Re: Effective connectivity using 1dSEM

O.M. August 27, 2014 12:22PM