I recommend that you use 1dSVAR instead of 1dSEM:
[
afni.nimh.nih.gov]
> My output yielded path coefficients within the -8 and 8 range. Maybe I ran something wrong
> because most of the papers I've seen report within the -1 1 range.
The path coefficient can be any value. For its interpretation, see page 1151 in the following paper:
[
www.sciencedirect.com]
Gang