History of AFNI updates  

|
October 01, 2014 12:24PM
> But doesn't it make more sense to estimate the smoothness from the residuals of the
> group analysis? That's how the smoothness is estimated from each subject.

Ideally that should be the case. However, there are two reasons for the current situation: 1) most group analysis programs currently don't directly generate the residuals; 2) there seems no well-established approach as to how the FWHM values should be estimated at the group level.

Gang
Subject Author Posted

Clustsim for group analysis

kickan September 10, 2014 04:52AM

Re: Clustsim for group analysis

nick September 10, 2014 10:07AM

Re: Clustsim for group analysis

kickan September 10, 2014 10:56AM

Re: Clustsim for group analysis

nick September 10, 2014 12:10PM

Re: Clustsim for group analysis

kickan September 11, 2014 02:44AM

Re: Clustsim for group analysis

rick reynolds September 11, 2014 08:42AM

Re: Clustsim for group analysis

kickan September 30, 2014 05:02AM

Re: Clustsim for group analysis

gang September 30, 2014 10:36AM

Re: Clustsim for group analysis

kickan October 01, 2014 09:48AM

Re: Clustsim for group analysis

gang October 01, 2014 12:24PM

Re: Clustsim for group analysis

rick reynolds October 01, 2014 09:24PM

Re: Clustsim for group analysis

nicholst October 13, 2014 12:58AM

Re: Clustsim for group analysis

gang October 14, 2014 09:54AM