AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
December 01, 2014 11:56AM
Hi MB,

Functional MRI does not have great temporal
resolution to estimate baseline on a per-trial
basis, particularly in the typical case of a
fast event design. Even with a slow or block
design, one would need long rest periods (at
least 30 seconds) to even have a shot at doing
it robustly. And 30 seconds intervals would
only give maybe 15 seconds after BOLD recovery
to estimate the baseline with, which seems very
short and prone to be noisy, making the BOLD
estimates similarly noisy.

Since that would take a lot of extra "rest"
time, it means opportunity for stimulus time
would be similarly lost. And researchers tend
to covet time for stimulus events.

- rick
Subject Author Posted

Normalization

mb November 20, 2014 08:57AM

Re: Normalization (in time)

Emperor Zhark November 20, 2014 10:20AM

Re: Normalization (in time)

mb November 25, 2014 02:03PM

Re: Normalization (in time)

rick reynolds December 01, 2014 11:56AM