AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
January 25, 2015 11:38AM
Hi,

We're hoping to use 3dClustSim to define the cluster extent (# of voxels) needed to reach significance for VBM data, which we analyzed with the VBM8 toolbox in SPM8. We'll need to obtain smoothness estimates from 3dFWHMx.

Since the instructions 3dFWHMx are geared towards fMRI data and suggest using the errts, it is not clear what to use to calculate smoothness estimates from structural data in VBM analysis. Since we do not run individual level models for VBM (these are 3D instead of 4D datasets and we don't remove motion/conduct statistics at the indivdual level), we don't have errts (residuals) at the individual-level.

Specific questions:
1. What should be used as the input to 3dFWHMx for VBM data?
Would it be the smoothed gray matter images (which are the inputs to our group-level statistical models)?
e.g., simply "3dFWHMx -automask -input smoothed_GM_$subj" or are more options needed?


2a. Once we have the fwhm values, are there any other options we should specify in our 3dClustSim command given this is for structural VBM data? e.g., is it simply "3dClustSim -dxyz 1.5 1.5 1.5 -fwhmxyz sx sy sz -prefix output"? Are there other options we need?
2b. Does it matter if we specify "-dxyz 1.5 1.5 1.5" (VBM8 toolbox automatically resamples to 1.5x1.5x1.5) or use the "-mask" option?
With the "-mask" option, would it be appropriate to use our custom template gray matter image, or should this be some other mask?

Thanks,
Andrea
Subject Author Posted

Input files to 3dFWHMx and 3dClustSim command for VBM data (from SPM)

andrea.gold@nih.gov January 25, 2015 11:38AM

Re: Input files to 3dFWHMx and 3dClustSim command for VBM data (from SPM)

Peter Molfese January 25, 2015 12:43PM

Re: Input files to 3dFWHMx and 3dClustSim command for VBM data (from SPM)

andrea.gold@nih.gov January 28, 2015 02:45PM

Re: Input files to 3dFWHMx and 3dClustSim command for VBM data (from SPM)

Peter Molfese January 28, 2015 03:32PM