AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
March 12, 2015 12:48PM
Gang Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Michael,
>
> > This is referring to standard deviation,
> correct? Additionally, How would you calculate the
> standard error?
>
> Regarding standard deviation vs. standard error:
> standard deviation usually refers to the extent of
> how spread or concentrated the data (or samples)
> are, while standard error is more used to
> described the accuracy or reliability of an
> estimator (e.g., estimated coefficient in a
> model).
>

To calculate the standard devation you said the formula is:

beta divided by t (or z)

The beta is the subbrik before the z subbrik in the output of 3dLME?

What is the calculation for the standard error? Does it differ from the traditional calculation of standard-deviation/sqrt(n).



> > Why is it an approximation? Because it is
> derived from a mixed model as opposed to a
> standard glm?
>
> Yes, the statistics from a linear mixed-effects
> model are mostly approximate based on asymptotic
> properties. In other words, they are more accurate
> if the sample size is reasonably large enough.


Great. Thanks!
Subject Author Posted

3dLME - 2 within-subjects factors + covariate?

mrif February 23, 2015 02:03PM

Re: 3dLME - 2 within-subjects factors + covariate?

gang February 23, 2015 02:33PM

Re: 3dLME - 2 within-subjects factors + covariate?

mrif February 24, 2015 01:17PM

Re: 3dLME - 2 within-subjects factors + covariate?

gang February 24, 2015 02:49PM

Re: 3dLME - 2 within-subjects factors + covariate?

mrif February 26, 2015 02:51PM

Re: 3dLME - 2 within-subjects factors + covariate?

gang February 27, 2015 10:05AM

Re: 3dLME - 2 within-subjects factors + covariate?

mrif March 02, 2015 11:11AM

Re: 3dLME - 2 within-subjects factors + covariate?

mrif March 08, 2015 02:11PM

Re: 3dLME - 2 within-subjects factors + covariate?

gang March 09, 2015 10:40AM

Re: 3dLME - 2 within-subjects factors + covariate?

mrif March 10, 2015 02:24PM

Re: 3dLME - 2 within-subjects factors + covariate?

gang March 11, 2015 09:45AM

Re: 3dLME - 2 within-subjects factors + covariate?

mrif March 11, 2015 11:44AM

Re: 3dLME - 2 within-subjects factors + covariate?

gang March 11, 2015 06:10PM

Re: 3dLME - 2 within-subjects factors + covariate?

mrif March 11, 2015 07:46PM

Re: 3dLME - 2 within-subjects factors + covariate?

gang March 12, 2015 11:57AM

Re: 3dLME - 2 within-subjects factors + covariate?

mrif March 12, 2015 12:48PM

Re: 3dLME - 2 within-subjects factors + covariate?

gang March 12, 2015 04:13PM

Re: 3dLME - 2 within-subjects factors + covariate?

mrif March 13, 2015 10:09AM

Re: 3dLME - 2 within-subjects factors + covariate?

gang March 14, 2015 10:21AM

Re: 3dLME - 2 within-subjects factors + covariate?

mrif March 15, 2015 11:23PM