History of AFNI updates  

|
April 21, 2015 05:04PM
Hi Rick,

I found the following article that seems to indicate what you suggest:

[www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov]

I assume 3dDeconvolve implements an adaptive two-stage FDR approach as it is described in 3dFDR. According to the paper, would this mean that a two-stage FDR approach might not be appropriate if statistical values are very high in the entire brain?

Dataset was acquired at 7T and preprocessed as follows:
- RETROICOR, RVT, CR, and Legendre polynomials up to 4-th order
- Smoothing with 4mm FWHM Gaussian kernel
- Computation of signal percentage with 3dcalc -expr 'a - mean(a)/mean(a)'

Yes, please let me know how to upload the data.
Subject Author Posted

FDR q-values smaller than Uncorrected p-values with 3dDeconvolve

Cesar Caballero Gaudes April 21, 2015 01:36PM

Re: FDR q-values smaller than Uncorrected p-values with 3dDeconvolve

rick reynolds April 21, 2015 04:12PM

Re: FDR q-values smaller than Uncorrected p-values with 3dDeconvolve

Cesar Caballero Gaudes April 21, 2015 05:04PM

Re: FDR q-values smaller than Uncorrected p-values with 3dDeconvolve

rick reynolds April 22, 2015 01:37PM