History of AFNI updates  

|
August 04, 2015 10:17AM
I wrote 3dclust back in the Paleolithic days of AFNI, and my decision then to report only 1 decimal place was for 2 reasons:
  • Keeping the table compact
  • Not pretending to have more precision than really exists
About the latter point: even printing to 0.1 mm accuracy is really too much -- considering FMRI voxels are usually 2-3 mm in size. I can't see how it's reasonable to expect precision to the 10 or even 1 micron level from such data.

Only for a special application to super-resolution voxels (probably not from MRI) would it be reasonable (IMHO) to give more decimal places.
Subject Author Posted

3dclust precision

rollom July 30, 2015 12:24PM

Re: 3dclust precision

rick reynolds July 30, 2015 01:27PM

Re: 3dclust precision

rollom July 30, 2015 03:50PM

Re: 3dclust precision

Isaac Schwabacher July 30, 2015 03:56PM

Re: 3dclust precision

Peter Molfese July 30, 2015 03:59PM

Re: 3dclust precision

Emperor Zhark August 04, 2015 10:17AM