AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
April 05, 2016 11:33AM
Hi-

Just to check-- what version of TORTOISE are you using?

1. Would different coordinate systems influence FATCAT? Is (0,0,0) at the center of volume a per-requisite for FATCAT to work properly? (I've checked that the FATCAT_Demo AVEB0_DWI.nii.gz has (0,0,0) at the center of volume)

I will assume you are using the 'afni export' from DIFF_CALC? (And thus, you get 2 files: DWI.nii and BMTXT.txt? Or do you export something different?)

TORTOISE will output into what AFNI calls RPI coordinates, and will have a specific origin based on the voxel dimensions. For me, typically the orientation and origin of the post-TORTOISEd DWI set is:
$ 3dinfo -orient -o3 DWI.nii
RPI	-1.500000	-1.500000	1.500000
(NB: mri_info would call this 'LAS' orientation.)

2. Is there any simple option provided by Tortoise to handle this? Since calcvm is equipped with AFNI Export, it would be sensible that the outputs have already conformed to AFNI convention.

Well, TORTOISE just outputs with a single orientation and origin, always; it doesn't follow what is input. However, you can adjust this later on, if you wish, using AFNI commands of 3drefit, for example. I use a script that will refit the data to have the same orientation and origin as the T2w reference volume, and then do a bit of tracking for sanity checking. I can send it to you, if you want; but it would be useful to know what versions of TORTOISE and AFNI you are using first.

However, it should be noted that the output data itself isn't wrong or unusable-- it just doesn't match up (spatially or orientationally) to what was input. Tracking and everything still works perfectly fine in this space.

--pt
Subject Author Posted

Motion correction for DTI

kickan September 19, 2015 01:40PM

Re: Motion correction for DTI

ptaylor September 19, 2015 02:42PM

Re: Motion correction for DTI

kickan September 19, 2015 02:49PM

Re: Motion correction for DTI

ptaylor September 19, 2015 03:25PM

Re: Motion correction for DTI

kickan September 19, 2015 04:45PM

Re: Motion correction for DTI

ptaylor September 19, 2015 05:25PM

Re: Motion correction for DTI

rick reynolds September 19, 2015 09:09PM

Re: Motion correction for DTI

Daniel Glen September 22, 2015 04:22PM

Re: Motion correction for DTI

kickan October 05, 2015 03:55PM

Re: Motion correction for DTI

ptaylor October 05, 2015 10:59PM

Re: Motion correction for DTI

JoJo March 30, 2016 04:08AM

Re: Motion correction for DTI

Peter Molfese March 30, 2016 06:30AM

Re: Motion correction for DTI

JoJo March 30, 2016 08:24AM

Re: Motion correction for DTI

ptaylor March 30, 2016 09:19AM

Re: Motion correction for DTI

JoJo March 30, 2016 09:53AM

Re: Motion correction for DTI

ptaylor March 30, 2016 09:57AM

Re: Motion correction for DTI

Peter Molfese March 30, 2016 10:45AM

Re: Motion correction for DTI

JoJo March 30, 2016 11:30AM

Re: Motion correction for DTI

JoJo March 30, 2016 01:17PM

Re: Motion correction for DTI

ptaylor March 30, 2016 02:01PM

Re: Motion correction for DTI

JoJo April 05, 2016 10:24AM

Re: Motion correction for DTI

ptaylor April 05, 2016 11:33AM

Re: Motion correction for DTI

JoJo April 05, 2016 10:35PM

Re: Motion correction for DTI

ptaylor April 06, 2016 09:24AM