AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
November 16, 2015 09:04PM
Dear AFNI experts,

I followed the procedure of gPPI (see the link below) to do connectivity analysis for an block-design fMRI experiment.
[afni.nimh.nih.gov]
Below is my script:
3dDetrend -polort 1 -prefix ${connf}/${roi}/${1}.${roi}.Seed_dtr.1D ${connf}/${roi}/${1}.${roi}.sSeed.1D\'
1dtranspose ${connf}/${roi}/${1}.${roi}.Seed_dtr.1D ${connf}/${roi}/${1}.${roi}.Seed_dtr_t.1D

waver -dt 2 -GAM -inline 1@1 > ${connf}/${roi}/GammaHR.1D
3dTfitter -RHS ${connf}/${roi}/${1}.${roi}.Seed_dtr_t.1D -FALTUNG ${connf}/${roi}/GammaHR.1D ${connf}/${roi}/${1}.${roi}.Seed_dtr_t_Neur.1D 012 0

1deval -a ${connf}/${roi}/${1}.${roi}.Seed_dtr_t_Neur.1D\' -/new_vis_reg.txt -expr "a*b" > ${connf}/${roi}/${1}.visualReg.1D
1deval -a ${connf}/${roi}/${1}.${roi}.Seed_dtr_t_Neur.1D\' -b /new_aud_reg.txt -expr "a*b" > ${connf}/${roi}/${1}.audioReg.1D

waver -GAM -peak 1 -TR 2 -input ${connf}/${roi}/${1}.visualReg.1D -numout 360 > ${connf}/${roi}/${1}.visualReg_gm.1D
waver -GAM -peak 1 -TR 2 -input ${connf}/${roi}/${1}.audioReg.1D -numout 360 > ${connf}/${roi}/${1}.audioReg_gm.1D

3dDeconvolve -input pb03.$subj.r*.blur+orig.HEAD \
-censor censor*.1D \
-polort A \
-local_times \
-num_stimts 11 \
-stim_times_AM1 1 c2_visual.txt 'dmBLOCK(0)' \
-stim_label 1 Vis \
-stim_times_AM1 2 c1_auditory.txt 'dmBLOCK(0)' \
-stim_label 2 Aud \
-stim_file 3 motion_demean.1D'[0]' -stim_base 3 -stim_label 3 roll \
-stim_file 4 motion_demean.1D'[1]' -stim_base 4 -stim_label 4 pitch \
-stim_file 5 motion_demean.1D'[2]' -stim_base 5 -stim_label 5 yaw \
-stim_file 6 motion_demean.1D'[3]' -stim_base 6 -stim_label 6 dS \
-stim_file 7 motion_demean.1D'[4]' -stim_base 7 -stim_label 7 dL \
-stim_file 8 motion_demean.1D'[5]' -stim_base 8 -stim_label 8 dP \
-stim_file 9 ${1}.${roi}.Seed_dtr_t.1D -stim_label 9 ${roi}_ts \
-stim_file 10 ${1}.visualReg_gm.1D -stim_label 10 ${roi}*Vis \
-stim_file 11 ${1}.audioReg_gm.1D -stim_label 11 ${roi}*Aud \


The effect of interest was the connectivity between one seed ROI and the whole head under two experimental conditons (see the stim_files 10 and 11).
Surprisingly, the connectivity was almost all negative across the whole head except that the seed ROI positively correlated with itself.
I wonder whether anyone encounters the same situation and would love to know why it is the case. Thank you.

Sincerely,
Veda
Subject Author Posted

problem with gPPI: negative correlation in the whole head

Veda November 16, 2015 09:04PM

Re: problem with gPPI: negative correlation in the whole head

rick reynolds November 20, 2015 10:14AM

Re: problem with gPPI: negative correlation in the whole head

Veda March 09, 2016 06:06PM