AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
March 16, 2016 04:53AM
Dear Gang,

Thank you for your response. I understand that GAM and dmBLOCK does not assume the undershoot, but around 5 s, I expected the direction of effect to match the TENT model. But anyways, it seems using TENT-basis model better catches the time course.

I married the 1D files (onset:duration) term for stim_times_IM, rather than modelling different durations of delay separately. Because I am not really interested in effects due to the delay period duration, I wanted to remove the potential differences arise from different duration.

For your second point on how to untangle the two phases as they are yoked.. So I thought about modelling them as one regressor from the onset of cue. I am still bit juggling around to decide - But I think it is important to model the delay period as I expect some amount of neural activity for WM maintenance..

Thanks for your input!
Subject Author Posted

TENT versus dmBLOCK to model retention delay period

sjmich March 15, 2016 10:45AM

Re: TENT versus dmBLOCK to model retention delay period

gang March 15, 2016 03:06PM

Re: TENT versus dmBLOCK to model retention delay period

sjmich March 16, 2016 04:53AM

Re: TENT versus dmBLOCK to model retention delay period

gang March 16, 2016 02:15PM