AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
Anonymous User
July 21, 2016 05:15PM
Hi all,

I'm experiencing troubles while analyzing connectivity data from gPPI with 3dLME. I ihave a fixed effect (emotion) and a random effect (reaction time).
I get in output a main effect for emotion, the random effect (that should be the correlation between connectivity and reaction time), and the interaction.

Now the trouble.
After thresholding and visualizing results, I extracted values of connectivity from clusters affected by the main effect and the reaction time (with 3dROIstats). But, in some cases, I DO NOT see correlations at all between reaction time and connectivity extracted from those clusters! I still can't understand why I see the effect only in the model and not after extraction. I was wondering if this can be due to using a small mask (~2000 voxel).
Any ideas?

[ I considered only values of alpha < 0.05 ]

thanks in advance,
Simone

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

here is the model, if it may be useful

3dLME \
-prefix LME_out \
-jobs 4 \
-model "condition*react" \
-mask mask_TN+tlrc \
-qVars "react" \
-qVarCenters '0' \
-ranEff '~1*react' \
-SS_type 3 \
-num_glt 7 \
-gltLabel 1 'neutral' -gltCode 1 'condition : 1*neutral' \
-gltLabel 2 'negative' -gltCode 2 'condition : 1*negative' \
-gltLabel 3 'neutral-negative' -gltCode 3 'condition : 1*neutral -1*negative' \ <---main effect
-gltLabel 4 'neu-RT' -gltCode 4 'condition : 1*neutral react :' \
-gltLabel 5 'negRT' -gltCode 5 'condition : 1*negative react :' \
-gltLabel 6 'Interaction' -gltCode 6 'condition : 1*neutral -1*negative react :' \ <---interaction
-gltLabel 7 'correlationRT' -gltCode 7 'react' \ <---correlation
-dataTable \
Subj react condition InputFile \
s1 75.1017 neutral ../../subjF1/bucket_ppi+tlrc'[4]' \
s2 -47.3512 neutral ../../subjF2/bucket_ppi+tlrc'[4]' \
.
.
s17 85.9628 neutral ../../subjF17/bucket_ppi+tlrc'[4]' \
s1 17.2099 negative ../../subjF1/bucket_ppi+tlrc'[6]' \
s2 -53.1114 negative ../../subjF2/bucket_ppi+tlrc'[6]' \
.
.
s17 107.1490 negative ../../subjF17/bucket_ppi+tlrc'[6]'

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject Author Posted

3dLME 'problem'

Anonymous User July 21, 2016 05:15PM

Re: 3dLME 'problem'

gang July 21, 2016 05:36PM

Re: 3dLME 'problem'

Anonymous User July 22, 2016 04:55AM

Re: 3dLME 'problem'

gang July 25, 2016 10:00AM

Re: 3dLME 'problem'

Anonymous User July 25, 2016 10:13AM

Re: 3dLME 'problem'

gang July 25, 2016 10:33AM

Re: 3dLME 'problem'

Anonymous User July 25, 2016 12:19PM

Re: 3dLME 'problem'

gang July 25, 2016 02:28PM

Re: 3dLME 'problem'

Anonymous User July 25, 2016 03:40PM

Re: 3dLME 'problem'

gang July 25, 2016 04:14PM

Re: 3dLME 'problem'

Anonymous User July 25, 2016 04:43PM

Re: 3dLME 'problem'

Anonymous User July 28, 2016 03:15PM