AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
November 23, 2016 11:30AM
Hi Bob --

I have completed cluster thresholding, and do not get any significant task based activity for any of my tasks, which is why I thought I was getting the FDR q warning. I am thinking there is something wrong with my data analysis and that is why I'm not getting any significant activity anywhere. So far, I have checked the stim time files and head motion, and there doesn't seem to be any issues there. Additionally, I've done an outlier analysis to see if any subjects had weird data, and there are no outliers.

Would it make sense to add additional blur into the analysis? I'm currently at 4mm, but I can increase that if you think that could help.

Thanks,
Derek
Subject Author Posted

Smallest FDR q error when running 3dttest++

archerdb November 02, 2016 11:54AM

Re: Smallest FDR q error when running 3dttest++

gang November 02, 2016 12:15PM

Re: Smallest FDR q error when running 3dttest++

Bob Cox November 03, 2016 01:38PM

Re: Smallest FDR q error when running 3dttest++

archerdb November 22, 2016 02:13PM

Re: Smallest FDR q error when running 3dttest++

Bob Cox November 22, 2016 03:03PM

Re: Smallest FDR q error when running 3dttest++

archerdb November 23, 2016 11:30AM

Re: Smallest FDR q error when running 3dttest++

Bob Cox November 23, 2016 12:42PM