AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
November 21, 2016 04:11AM
Dear expert

i have read about the importance of implementing noise smoothness information within cluster-based correction methods (particularly when using 3DClustSim). I have been running a VBM analysis and am trying to calculate the appropriate cluster size under which my findings remain valid using an initial cluster defining p<0.001 and alpha of 0.05.

My questions are:
- is the acf smoothness calculation needed for VBM studies too (as it usually refer to fMRI findings)
- could anyone provide me with help on how to implement this?

what i currently did is using the following command:
./3dClustSim -mask gm_multiple_r_mask.nii.gz -fwhm 8 -pthr .1 .05 .02 .01 0.005 0.001 -prefix 3dclustsim_gm_multiple_r_mask

as a mask i used my DARTEL template that was constructed for the present adolescent sample in order to reduce the correction to gray matter volume.

Thanks a ton on any input/help!
Bernadette
Subject Author Posted

ACF and VBM data

bernadetterusch November 21, 2016 04:11AM

Re: ACF and VBM data

gang November 21, 2016 11:00AM

Re: ACF and VBM data

bernadetterusch November 26, 2016 02:44PM

Re: ACF and VBM data

gang November 28, 2016 09:01AM

Re: ACF and VBM data

Bob Cox November 28, 2016 03:19PM