AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
April 10, 2017 03:36PM
Gang,

Thanks for your response.

We are running a 4 x 3 x 3 model. All within subjects factors.

3 Factors:

Visit: 1, 2, 3 4
Temp: 1 2 3
Trial: 1 2 3

We do have missing data for 1 subject. That subject has missing data from 1 visit. They only have data from 3 out of 4 visits.

In addition to the random effects question, there is something else:

We've run this model without specifying the correlation structure, so it is using compound symmetry, no? Something weird is going on with the output, that doesn't look right compared to when we run 3dMVM with a complete data set. We aren't expecting identical results, but not such a wide disparity.. I don't think it is something with 3dLME because I get the same results using SPSS on extracted data from a voxel. Just wondering if having data missing for an entire visit has substantial effect on the results.

Thanks.

Michael
Subject Author Posted

3dLME random effect

mrif April 03, 2017 05:00PM

Re: 3dLME random effect

gang April 04, 2017 01:31PM

Re: 3dLME random effect

mrif April 10, 2017 03:36PM

Re: 3dLME random effect

gang April 11, 2017 02:02PM

Re: 3dLME random effect

mrif April 12, 2017 11:10AM

Re: 3dLME random effect

gang April 14, 2017 06:08PM