AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

Previous Message Next Message
Message List New Topic Print View
|
sjmich
June 05, 2017 07:39PM
Dear Gang,

Thank you very much for your reply. The covariates of no interest are between-subjects quantitative variables -- for this, then I would use 3dMVM.

But in the further analysis, I might want to pursue to add quantitative variables that are within-subjects (associated with each of w/s-condition). This would require 3dLME in the end? If it is within-subjects variable, the qVarCenter should specify the centering value considering all conditions across all subjects? So when the model is being tested, data will be all scaled (subtracted by qVarcenter value)?

Thanks a lot for your help!

Michelle.
Reply Quote
RSS
Subject Author Posted

3dLME vs. 3dMVM

sjmich June 02, 2017 02:19PM

Re: 3dLME vs. 3dMVM

gang June 05, 2017 04:43PM

Re: 3dLME vs. 3dMVM

sjmich June 05, 2017 07:39PM

Re: 3dLME vs. 3dMVM

gang June 06, 2017 02:52PM

Re: 3dLME vs. 3dMVM Attachments

mrif June 16, 2017 12:31PM

Re: 3dLME vs. 3dMVM

gang June 19, 2017 05:29PM

Re: 3dLME vs. 3dMVM

mrif June 22, 2017 04:52PM