AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
September 25, 2017 11:16AM
Dear Rick,

Thanks a lot for your response! Removing only drift at 1/320 Hz might be sensitivity-inefficient. It might be expected that low frequency drifts are either related to the scanner or to the task-unrelated physiology and thus they should be removed. Otherwise, the low frequency drifts decrease the sensitivity for task-fMRI analyses. In FSL and SPM by default all low-frequency drifts below 1/100 and 1/128 are removed, and I usually see more significant activation when I make this cutoff frequency higher.

The polort function is from 3dDeconvolve, sorry for not clarifying that in my original post!

So my current understanding is that for an ordinary single-subject fMRI analysis, afni_proc.py will by default remove the very, very low frequency drift using polort (even if I do not directly call polort), and if I want to remove other low-frequency drifts I should use regress_bandpass. Am I correct?

However, AFNI help for regress-bandpass says:

-regress_bandpass lowf highf : bandpass the frequency range
e.g. -regress_bandpass 0.01 0.1
This option is intended for use in resting state analysis.

and so it suggests it is not for task-based data. How to interpret it?

Best,

Wiktor Olszowy



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 09/25/2017 11:31AM by wo222.
Subject Author Posted

why is the cutoff frequency used in the hpf so low?

wo222 September 21, 2017 10:20AM

Re: why is the cutoff frequency used in the hpf so low?

rick reynolds September 25, 2017 09:44AM

Re: why is the cutoff frequency used in the hpf so low?

wo222 September 25, 2017 11:16AM

Re: why is the cutoff frequency used in the hpf so low?

rick reynolds September 25, 2017 11:32AM

Re: why is the cutoff frequency used in the hpf so low?

wo222 September 25, 2017 11:45AM

Re: why is the cutoff frequency used in the hpf so low?

rick reynolds September 26, 2017 10:17AM