AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
May 09, 2018 06:54PM
I use AFNI and uber_subject.py and when ı look my afni_proc.py script it's look ok and also it performs all the processing without any error. At our project we are trying to compare non-stationary data NOTMOCO and stationary data MOCO . (MOCO has motion at 0.1mm-0.3mm band and NOTMOCO has motion at 1mm-2mm band and MOCO is the motion corrected NOTMOCO data created by MR own software). I use motion censor limit 3mm and at the result script it says there is no censored TR. But MOCO gave more meaningful clusters and more activated voxels than NOTMOCO and this result is just opposite at GIFT,CONN and REST. How can it be possible ? What should I do ?

afni_proc.py -subj_id $subj \
-script proc.$subj -scr_overwrite \
-blocks despike tshift align tlrc volreg blur mask regress \
-copy_anat $anat_dir/anat+orig \
-dsets $epi_dir/r01+orig.HEAD \
-tcat_remove_first_trs 5 \
-volreg_align_to third \
-volreg_align_e2a \
-volreg_tlrc_warp \
-blur_size 6.0 \
-regress_censor_motion 3.0 \
-regress_bandpass 0.01 0.1 \
-regress_apply_mot_types demean deriv \
-regress_est_blur_errts
Subject Author Posted

AFNI does not give logical result

trabz May 09, 2018 06:54PM