AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
May 24, 2018 05:53PM
Dear Gang,

Thank you for your quick response! Here are answers to your questions:

1) Any missing data?
No missing data

2) Equal number of subjects across the two groups?
The groups are unequal in size, something like 18 and 14

3) Do you have t-statistic available for each effect estimate (beta)?
I was planning to run the model on z-score maps that were converted from pearson correlation maps. That is, I am interested in seeing how "resting-state functional connectivity" changes differentially based on treatment.

I am thinking to run this command:
3dMVM -prefix group_treatment_interaction -jobs 1 -bsVars Group -wsVars Time -dataTable @table.txt
Where "table.txt" is organized like this:
Subj Group Time InputFile \
1 treatment_1 preTreatment /path_to_data/pretreatment_data.nii.gz \
1 treatment_1 postTreatment /path_to_data/posttreatment_data.nii.gz \
2 treatment_2 preTreatment /path_to_data/pretreatment_data.nii.gz \
2 treatment_2 postTreatment /path_to_data/posttreatment_data.nii.gz \
...

My undertanding is that 3dMVM computes interactions automatically between within and between subject effects, so I imagine an F-map output from this command will be what I am looking for. Correct?

Thank you for your help!

Matthew



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 05/24/2018 05:56PM by Matthew_2.
Subject Author Posted

Best way to assess longitudinal treatment effects

Matthew_2 May 24, 2018 01:42PM

Re: Best way to assess longitudinal treatment effects

gang May 24, 2018 05:34PM

Re: Best way to assess longitudinal treatment effects

Matthew_2 May 24, 2018 05:53PM

Re: Best way to assess longitudinal treatment effects

gang May 25, 2018 09:07AM

Re: Best way to assess longitudinal treatment effects

Matthew_2 May 25, 2018 12:24PM

Re: Best way to assess longitudinal treatment effects

gang May 27, 2018 12:28PM

Re: Best way to assess longitudinal treatment effects

Matthew_2 July 09, 2018 06:47PM

Re: Best way to assess longitudinal treatment effects

gang July 13, 2018 05:58PM