Hi Rick,
Thanks a lot for your precious guidance ! I run the command that you recommended me and indeed, it found a very 'basic' typo error.
Everything went then perfectly once I could correct for it.
Just a last question about how to interpret correctly the map that I got with the inclusion of the covariates. If I select a contrast with one of my covariate, let's say the BDI score which is a score of the severity of the symptoms characterizing depression and which has been centered, I get a deactivation between the Nucleus Accumbens (NAcc) and the PCC. I am wondering whether the right interpretation in this case is (1) once we control for the severity of depression symptoms (characterized by the score at the BDI questionnaire), we get this connectivity map, (2) the higher the BDI score, the lower the connectivity between the NAcc and the PCC or (3) the lower the BDI score, the lower the connectivity the connectivity between the NAcc and the PCC ?
Thanks so much !
Best wishes,
Claudie
Claudie