AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
September 12, 2018 12:18PM
Hi, Tamara-

Please note that actually there is a newer (and better) syntax for using @SSwarper since the start of July, as described in this post:
[afni.nimh.nih.gov]

From the **pre-July version** of @SSwarper's helpfile, the syntax is:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Usage: @SSwarper T1dataset SubID [minp]

T1dataset = a T1-weighted dataset, not skull-stripped,
            with resolution about 1 mm.
SubID     = name code for output datasets (e.g., 'sub007').
minp      = optional: minimum patch size on final 3dQwarp
                      (if not given, 11 is used)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
and only the specific MNI template could be used as a reference; there is no place for a reference dset to be entered, so it should not be as in your "old" syntax. Whatever the third argument is is probably being interpreted as "minpath"; in your case, what you identify as a subj id is being identified as a minpatch size, and causing woe (I guess).

Note that the **modern, post-July version** of @SSwarper has nicer syntax, more flexibility of choosing reference datasets, and more "-prefix" functionality:
@SSwarper          \
        -input  AA        \
        -base   BB        \
        -subid  SS        \
       {-odir OD}         \
       {-minp MP}

The processing guts of the program are the same. I would strongly consider the modern @SSwarper because of the syntax/flexibility.

--pt
Subject Author Posted

@SSwarper code running for days?

tamtam September 12, 2018 10:33AM

Re: @SSwarper code running for days?

ptaylor September 12, 2018 12:18PM

Re: @SSwarper code running for days?

tamtam September 13, 2018 08:19AM

Re: @SSwarper code running for days?

ptaylor September 13, 2018 08:34AM

Re: @SSwarper code running for days?

tamtam September 13, 2018 03:09PM