AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

Previous Message Next Message
Message List New Topic Print View
|
chaj
February 06, 2019 04:52PM
In our study we have 4(levels) groups and 2(levels) conditions so we looked at the main effect of group x condition.
Now we want to look at the post-hoc that is the group differences between any 2 groups, to do that we have extracted the beta values form the regions of group x conditionresults and performed ANOVA in SPSS.
Would this be a right way of showing the post-hocs or should we just do the post-hoc ttest in AFNI using 3dLME model of group x condition?

Jung
Reply Quote
RSS
Subject Author Posted

Post hoc test after 3dLME

chaj February 06, 2019 04:52PM

Re: Post hoc test after 3dLME

gang February 07, 2019 03:54PM

Re: Post hoc test after 3dLME

chaj February 07, 2019 04:31PM

Re: Post hoc test after 3dLME

gang February 07, 2019 05:06PM