History of AFNI updates  

|
February 27, 2019 09:00AM
Hi, Dan-

You have mentioned "small head motion, <3mm". Actually, I would say that large headmotion can still fit under that categorization.

Are you running the new afni_proc.py APQC-HTML stuff? If so, do you have the enorm+outlier plot that you could show here (or send offline)?

And it looks like you are not censoring points with motion/outliers... that might further lead to suspicion of motion. Consider if you are showing a funny movie, and subjects giggle at the same point-- that would lead to stimulus correlated motion, and something that would show up precisely as high correlation in a naturalistic design.

I will also PM you instructions for uploading the data if you would like me to take a look in vivo.

--pt
Subject Author Posted

HELP! problem with bright ventricle after 3dTcorrelate Attachments

Dan February 27, 2019 08:43AM

Re: HELP! problem with bright ventricle after 3dTcorrelate

ptaylor February 27, 2019 09:00AM

Re: HELP! problem with bright ventricle after 3dTcorrelate

rick reynolds February 27, 2019 09:41AM

Re: HELP! problem with bright ventricle after 3dTcorrelate

ptaylor February 27, 2019 10:16AM

Re: HELP! problem with bright ventricle after 3dTcorrelate

Daniel Glen February 27, 2019 10:56AM

problem with bright ventricle after 3dTcorrelate Attachments

Dan February 26, 2019 08:24AM

Re: problem with bright ventricle after 3dTcorrelate

Peter Molfese February 26, 2019 09:57AM

Re: problem with bright ventricle after 3dTcorrelate Attachments

Dan February 27, 2019 03:22AM

Re: problem with bright ventricle after 3dTcorrelate

Peter Molfese February 27, 2019 09:39AM

Re: problem with bright ventricle after 3dTcorrelate Attachments

Dan March 04, 2019 08:57AM

Re: problem with bright ventricle after 3dTcorrelate

ptaylor March 04, 2019 09:57AM

Re: problem with bright ventricle after 3dTcorrelate Attachments

Dan March 05, 2019 03:08AM

Re: problem with bright ventricle after 3dTcorrelate

ptaylor March 05, 2019 08:01AM