AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
March 13, 2019 09:16AM
Hi Robin,

Actually, scaling does have a small effect on the statistical maps. The reason is that scaling is done per run. That should not be a big effect, but it will make the difference more than just truncation size (assuming there is more than just one run). And yes, it would indeed affect ROI averages.

For resting state analysis, with a single voxel as the seed, there would still be that small effect. And many seeds are from radial or ROI averages. While those should not be very important, there would be SOME effect, and therefore there would be some at the group level.

For this type of analysis, scaling is not considered important. Do it or don't. Our resting state examples currently have scaling included, but just because there are some fringe benefits, depending on what other computations are desired. If all you are running is a correlation analysis, either way should be fine.

- rick
Subject Author Posted

Afni_proc.py: Scale block

Robin March 12, 2019 06:13AM

Re: Afni_proc.py: Scale block

rick reynolds March 13, 2019 09:16AM