AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

Previous Message Next Message
Message List New Topic Print View
|
tamtam
May 01, 2019 03:50PM
Thank you very much for reviewing the values.

Yes, I used a blur of 4 via the afni_proc.py. Based on my protocol, my voxels for my epi volumes are 2x2x3mm and for my anat volumes are 1x1x1.

For the mask, I came across a few threads indicating the use of 3dmask_tool. I created and ran the following code below on a few participants and this seemed to work well. Is there a reason that the group mask is constructed at 70% overlap and not a higher overlap value?

3dmask_tool -input [subjects results folder] full_mask*tlrc.HEAD -prefix mask_group.7 \ -frac 0.7

Thank you very much,
Tamara
Reply Quote
RSS
Subject Author Posted

3dClustSim

tamtam May 01, 2019 09:06AM

Re: 3dClustSim

rick reynolds May 01, 2019 01:15PM

Re: 3dClustSim

tamtam May 01, 2019 03:50PM

Re: 3dClustSim

rick reynolds May 01, 2019 10:35PM