AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
May 21, 2019 02:33PM
Hi,

I would like to ask about 3dLME GLT coding.
I just bring the 'example 3' from '3dLME' instruction on the web as following.

3dLME -prefix Example3 -jobs 24 \
-model "cond*group" \
-ranEff '~1' \
-SS_type 3 \
-num_glt 6 \
-gltLabel 1 'pos-neu' -gltCode 1 'cond : 1*pos -1*neu' \
-gltLabel 2 'neg' -gltCode 2 'cond : 1*neg ' \
-gltLabel 3 'pos+nue-neg' -gltCode 3 'cond : 1*pos +1*neu -1*neg' \
-gltLabel 4 'pat_pos-neu' -gltCode 4 'cond : 1*pos -1*neu group : 1*pat' \
-gltLabel 5 'pat_neg-neu' -gltCode 5 'cond : 1*neg -1*neu group : 1*pat' \
-gltLabel 6 'pat_pos-neg' -gltCode 6 'cond : 1*pos -1*neg group : 1*pat' \
-num_glf 1 \
-glfLabel 1 'pos-neu' -glfCode 1 'Group : 1*ctr & 1*pat cond : 1*pos -1*neu & 1*pos -1*neg' \
-dataTable \
Subj cond group InputFile \
s1 pos ctr s1+tlrc'[pos#0_Coef]' \
s1 neg ctr s1+tlrc'[neg#0_Coef]' \
s1 neu ctr s1+tlrc'[neu#0_Coef]' \
...
s21 pos pat s21+tlrc'[pos#0_Coef]' \
s21 neg pat s21+tlrc'[neg#0_Coef]' \
s21 neu pat s21+tlrc'[neu#0_Coef]' \

My question is if these following GLT coding would provide the identical t-test result.

1) -gltLabel 1 'pos-neu' -gltCode 1 'cond : 1*pos -1*neu' \

2) -gltLabel 7 'pos+nue-neg+neg' -gltCode 7 'cond : 1*pos +1*neu -1*neg -1*neu ' \


I assumed that in the second case condition 'neu' should be cancelled out.
I have tried this way with my data, but these two gave me the different result.
Could you let me know what happen in this coding?


Thanks

Jung



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 05/21/2019 04:01PM by chaj.
Subject Author Posted

3dLME GLT coding

chaj May 21, 2019 02:33PM

Re: 3dLME GLT coding

gang May 21, 2019 04:53PM

Re: 3dLME GLT coding

chaj May 22, 2019 08:35AM

Re: 3dLME GLT coding

gang May 22, 2019 02:15PM

Re: 3dLME GLT coding

chaj May 23, 2019 08:59AM

Re: 3dLME GLT coding

gang May 23, 2019 12:34PM