Hi Gang, sorry, I did not see this post until now. I read it over and yes - that is pretty much exactly what I was hoping to do. I would be creating the parcellations myself through ICA, rather than using pre-defined set, but other than that, the methods described are the same as I was imagining. Good to know that that is possible. Also -- Part III was very interesting -- excited to see the future updates that will be incorporating the BML.

Thank you!

- Ryann


Gang Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> > I was wondering if 3dISC has the capability to
> do an ISC analysis based on ROIs rather than
> voxels?
> > I was hoping to parcel my functional images into
> networks with ICA and to calculate the
> network-wise,
> > rather than voxel-wise, ISC between subjects.
>
> Would it be something like what's described in the
> following paper?
>
> [www.biorxiv.org]
>
> > Would I be able to use the images that have
> undergone ICA as inputs for 3dISC? Or do I need to
> > re-consider my analysis if I want to use the
> program?
>
> The input for 3dISC is typically the voxelwise ISC
> values from each pair of subjects. You would have
> to decide how your ICA results fit into this
> current context.