AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
October 24, 2019 10:45AM
Gotcha, thanks! I'm still trying to understand any difference between my data and your data that can cause this inconsistency with my data.

I think the only differences between the data sets are:
  • I input blurring options
  • I run unpaired t-tests
  • All of my data inputs are nifti files in MNI space

I'm having trouble looking into the effect of blurring because when I don't blur with my data, there's no longer significant voxels, and when I try to blur your data, I get an error.

Specifically, with 3 blur options in your data I get the error:
++ 3dXClustSim: AFNI version=AFNI_19.2.09 (Aug  5 2019) [64-bit]
++ Authored by: Lamont Cranston
++ Loading -insdat datasets
*+ WARNING: only 1612 input volumes, less than minimum of 10000
++ Single FPR goal: 9.0%
++ p-value thresholds: 0.0100 0.0090 0.0080 0.0070 0.0060 0.0050 0.0040 0.0030 0.0020 0.0010
++ min cluster size  : 5 voxels
** FATAL ERROR: number of input volumes=1612 not evenly divisible by ncase=3

and with 2 blur options:
++ 3dXClustSim: AFNI version=AFNI_19.2.09 (Aug  5 2019) [64-bit]
++ Authored by: Lamont Cranston
++ Loading -insdat datasets
*+ WARNING: only 1091 input volumes, less than minimum of 10000
++ Single FPR goal: 9.0%
++ p-value thresholds: 0.0100 0.0090 0.0080 0.0070 0.0060 0.0050 0.0040 0.0030 0.0020 0.0010
++ min cluster size  : 5 voxels
** FATAL ERROR: number of input volumes=1091 not evenly divisible by ncase=2

I'm confused by which "volumes" this number is referring to and how to fix it. I'm assuming it means spatial volumes, but I input the mask in your directory that appeared to be a whole brain mask. Any advice you could give would be greatly appreciated! Again, I apologize if this is a basic usage issue.
Subject Author Posted

ETAC 1-sided t-tests don't match 3dttest++ results

amennen October 18, 2019 09:45AM

Re: ETAC 1-sided t-tests don't match 3dttest++ results

rick reynolds October 18, 2019 10:30AM

Re: ETAC 1-sided t-tests don't match 3dttest++ results

amennen October 18, 2019 01:55PM

Re: ETAC 1-sided t-tests don't match 3dttest++ results

rick reynolds October 18, 2019 05:40PM

Re: ETAC 1-sided t-tests don't match 3dttest++ results

amennen October 21, 2019 10:47AM

Re: ETAC 1-sided t-tests don't match 3dttest++ results

rick reynolds October 23, 2019 09:26AM

Re: ETAC 1-sided t-tests don't match 3dttest++ results

amennen October 23, 2019 04:34PM

Re: ETAC 1-sided t-tests don't match 3dttest++ results

amennen October 23, 2019 04:56PM

Re: ETAC 1-sided t-tests don't match 3dttest++ results

rick reynolds October 23, 2019 06:25PM

Re: ETAC 1-sided t-tests don't match 3dttest++ results

amennen October 24, 2019 10:45AM

Re: ETAC 1-sided t-tests don't match 3dttest++ results

rick reynolds October 25, 2019 01:03PM

Re: ETAC 1-sided t-tests don't match 3dttest++ results

amennen October 25, 2019 01:42PM

Re: ETAC 1-sided t-tests don't match 3dttest++ results

rick reynolds October 25, 2019 03:25PM

Re: ETAC 1-sided t-tests don't match 3dttest++ results

amennen October 25, 2019 04:18PM

Re: ETAC 1-sided t-tests don't match 3dttest++ results

amennen October 30, 2019 02:48PM