Hi Paul,
Yes, that is the Sorensen-Dice coefficient.
1. The correspondence won't be great, as the dice coefficient mostly shows whether the masks are approximately on top of each other. Since the coverage tends to differ, it mostly just shows whether there was a gross failure.
2. Sure, I will look into adding it for the anat/template.
Okay, that is in. Once we do a new build, the AP analysis should include a pair of results, like:
anat/EPI mask Dice coef : 0.840899
anat/templ mask Dice coef : 0.947241
Does that seem good?
Thanks,
- rick
