AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
November 03, 2019 12:02PM
Hello, I have set up an analysis using afni_proc.py, but I would like to use only simple linear regression, not random effects. This is partly for time and space considerations, but also because I would like to compare my results to results from another package that does not have a random effects method. I understand that I could do ONLY the REMLfit by using the -x1D_stop option, but I want to do the opposite. Also, since the command and matrix for 3DREMLfit will be produced, I can go back and do the RE analysis later (which I may elect to do, but at this time do not want to). How can I do this? Do I just omit "-regress_reml_exec"?

Thank you,
Priya

Here is my afni_proc.py:


afni_proc.py -subj_id ${subj} \
-copy_anat ${subj}_structural+orig \
-dsets 00005+orig 00006+orig 00007+orig 00008+orig 00009+orig 00010+orig\
-blocks despike tshift align tlrc volreg blur mask \
scale regress \
-tcat_remove_first_trs 5 \
-align_opts_aea -cost lpc+ZZ \
-volreg_align_to MIN_OUTLIER \
-volreg_align_e2a \
-volreg_tlrc_warp \
-mask_epi_anat yes \
-regress_stim_times \
${subj}FarFracFrac.txt \
${subj}NearFracFrac.txt \
${subj}MedFracFrac.txt \
${subj}FarFracLine.txt \
${subj}NearFracLine.txt \
${subj}MedFracLine.txt \
${subj}FarLineLine.txt \
${subj}NearLineLine.txt \
${subj}MedLineLine.txt \
-regress_stim_labels farff nearff meDFf \
farfl \
nearfl \
meDFl \
farll \
nearll \
medll \
-regress_basis 'BLOCK(6,1)' \
-regress_motion_per_run \
-regress_censor_motion .3 \
-regress_reml_exec \
-regress_opts_3dD \
-gltsym 'SYM: +nearff +nearfl +nearll -farff -farfl -farll' \
-glt_label 1 all_near_far \
-gltsym 'SYM: +nearff -farff' \
-glt_label 1 FF_near_far \
-gltsym 'SYM: + +nearll -farll' \
-glt_label 1 LL_near_far \
-gltsym 'SYM: +nearfl -farfl' \
-glt_label 1 FL_near_far \
-regress_est_blur_epits \
-regress_est_blur_errts
Subject Author Posted

Analysis using afni proc.py but no REML

pkalra November 03, 2019 12:02PM

Re: Analysis using afni proc.py but no REML

rick reynolds November 03, 2019 07:53PM

Re: Analysis using afni proc.py but no REML

pkalra November 04, 2019 01:54PM

Re: Analysis using afni proc.py but no REML

rick reynolds November 05, 2019 08:49PM

Re: Analysis using afni proc.py but no REML

storrisi November 08, 2019 02:21PM

Re: Analysis using afni proc.py but no REML

rick reynolds November 08, 2019 05:36PM