AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

Previous Message Next Message
Message List New Topic Print View
|
vtarka
January 21, 2020 11:56AM
Hi Pete,

Well, what I'm thinking is that there are two options.

One is to extract the surface from Brainstorm with the data/values on it and import into SUMA, assuming the weird smoothing that alters the sulcification isn't imported along with it.

OR to export the data on the surface from Brainstorm as a NIfTI that's coregistered to the subject's anatomical used to generate the surface in the first place, then project that NIfTI data onto the SUMA surface as I've been doing with our fMRI data.

Do these seem like reasonable ideas? Is there something obvious to try that I'm missing?

Thank you! Veronica
Reply Quote
RSS
Subject Author Posted

Inflated state viewing for *.gii files

vtarka January 20, 2020 03:46PM

Re: Inflated state viewing for *.gii files

Peter Molfese January 21, 2020 10:00AM

Re: Inflated state viewing for *.gii files

vtarka January 21, 2020 10:41AM

Re: Inflated state viewing for *.gii files

Peter Molfese January 21, 2020 11:42AM

Re: Inflated state viewing for *.gii files

vtarka January 21, 2020 11:56AM

Re: Inflated state viewing for *.gii files

Peter Molfese January 21, 2020 01:40PM