AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
March 02, 2020 03:02AM
Sorry for a rude bump of my own post here but there were a few things that were not cleared out:

1) The errors in the output related to the check-flip option:
++ Writing -allcostX1D results to '__tt_lr_flipcosts.1D'
 +  - histogram: source clip 288.416 .. 1065.28; base clip 196.319 .. 848.294
 +  - versus source range 1.69773e-05 .. 1148.31; base range 0 .. 934.575
 + 53147 total points stored in 561 'RHDD(11.1151)' bloks
++ -allcostX1D finished
ERROR: error reading cost list file
No flip cost is 1000.000000 for lpc+zz cost function
ERROR: error reading cost list file
Flip cost is 1000.000000 for lpc+zz cost function
Data does not need flipping

2) I noticed that the despike block was removed in the 6b example. Did I miss the memo regarding despiking being bad?

3) As far as I understood the 6b example you only get the "anaicored" stats output since you use regress_3dD_stop. We want to get both with and without anaticor so I removed regress_3dD_stop. In a previous thread I was recommended by one of you to use -regress_anaticor_fast since it was supposed to be both faster and better but I don't see that in 6b. Is there a reason for this?

4) We have previously been using -regress_motion_types demean deriv. In 6b this is not specified and I think the default is only to use the de-meaned versions of the motion parameters. Is deriv not recommended?

Sorry for bump and thanks in advance!
Subject Author Posted

Updated AFNI pre-proc pipeline

Robin February 21, 2020 06:51AM

Re: Updated AFNI pre-proc pipeline

ptaylor February 21, 2020 07:17AM

Re: Updated AFNI pre-proc pipeline

Robin February 21, 2020 08:23AM

Re: Updated AFNI pre-proc pipeline

ptaylor February 21, 2020 08:42AM

Re: Updated AFNI pre-proc pipeline

Robin February 21, 2020 08:57AM

Re: Updated AFNI pre-proc pipeline

Robin February 21, 2020 09:24AM

Re: Updated AFNI pre-proc pipeline

ptaylor February 21, 2020 09:35AM

Re: Updated AFNI pre-proc pipeline Attachments

Robin February 24, 2020 04:53AM

Re: Updated AFNI pre-proc pipeline

ptaylor February 24, 2020 07:43AM

Re: Updated AFNI pre-proc pipeline

Robin February 24, 2020 07:59AM

Re: Updated AFNI pre-proc pipeline

Robin March 02, 2020 03:02AM

Re: Updated AFNI pre-proc pipeline

rick reynolds March 03, 2020 09:51AM

Re: Updated AFNI pre-proc pipeline

Robin March 03, 2020 04:15PM

Re: Updated AFNI pre-proc pipeline

krisknut March 11, 2020 02:35PM

Re: Updated AFNI pre-proc pipeline

rick reynolds March 11, 2020 04:35PM