History of AFNI updates  

|
March 30, 2020 10:43AM
Hi, Joy-

Great, glad that worked.

Personally, I don't think adding/subtracting options like "-giant_move" across a dataset analysis matters, if the quality of final alignments are all similar.

However, changing the regression model---not including the derivatives of motion now---would be the kind of change that would require re-running across all subjects. Everyone should have the same model specification run. (Note that this would also give you a chance to generate similar QC HTMLs, to help the systematic review across all subjects, so that would be a silver lining.)

-pt
Subject Author Posted

Alignment problem with afni_proc.py Attachments

joy0617 March 28, 2020 04:06PM

Re: Alignment problem with afni_proc.py

ptaylor March 28, 2020 05:40PM

Re: Alignment problem with afni_proc.py

joy0617 March 29, 2020 11:59AM

Re: Alignment problem with afni_proc.py

ptaylor March 29, 2020 01:15PM

Re: Alignment problem with afni_proc.py

joy0617 March 30, 2020 10:16AM

Re: Alignment problem with afni_proc.py

ptaylor March 30, 2020 10:43AM

Re: Alignment problem with afni_proc.py Attachments

joy0617 April 02, 2020 04:12PM

Re: Alignment problem with afni_proc.py

ptaylor April 02, 2020 07:02PM

Re: Alignment problem with afni_proc.py Attachments

ptaylor April 03, 2020 10:27AM

Re: Alignment problem with afni_proc.py Attachments

joy0617 April 03, 2020 11:24AM

Re: Alignment problem with afni_proc.py

ptaylor April 03, 2020 12:01PM

Re: Alignment problem with afni_proc.py Attachments

ptaylor April 04, 2020 12:09PM

Re: Alignment problem with afni_proc.py

joy0617 April 05, 2020 01:25PM

Re: Alignment problem with afni_proc.py Attachments

joy0617 March 29, 2020 12:03PM