AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
July 20, 2020 04:31PM
Hi-

Re 1: Sure, resampling that way makes sense. Note that if there are tiny ROIs in the Glasser atlas, those might disappear.

Re. 2: if your time series has zero mean (e.g., which might occur if it is residuals from resting state processing, say), then there shouldn't be a difference between extra zeros or not.
Note that you can also input a "weight" vector with "-weight_ts ..", which could be 1 for non-censored time points and 0 for censored time points-- such a beast would be created by afni_proc.py, and likely called censor_${subj}_combined_2.1D in the *.results/ directory.
... and you can compare the results of using the weight vector and not doing so to verify that there is no difference (again, *if* your times series all have zero mean).

Note that in assessing the statistical significance of the Pearson r, you would want to use the degrees of freedom of the time series, which is even different than the number of time points, often.

--pt
Subject Author Posted

3dNetCorr - handling censored TRs

kxd344 July 20, 2020 03:26PM

Re: 3dNetCorr - handling censored TRs

ptaylor July 20, 2020 04:31PM

Re: 3dNetCorr - handling censored TRs

kxd344 July 20, 2020 07:38PM