AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

Previous Message Next Message
Message List New Topic Print View
|
Juan
December 13, 2020 02:44PM
Hi, AFNI experts,

When I ran the 3dDeconvolve script, I got some warning alarms. Example outputs are below. The "Safe_Event","Threat_Event", "Error", and "Feedback" are regressors. Are these alarms problematic?

Thank you very much.
J

*+ WARNING: Smallest FDR q [2 Safe_Event#0_Tstat] = 0.999749 ==> few true single voxel detections
++ Smallest FDR q [4 Safe_Event#1_Tstat] = 3.93143e-13
++ Smallest FDR q [6 Safe_Event#2_Tstat] = 1.75954e-13
++ Smallest FDR q [8 Safe_Event#3_Tstat] = 2.32296e-11
++ Smallest FDR q [10 Safe_Event#4_Tstat] = 0.00250712
++ Smallest FDR q [12 Safe_Event#5_Tstat] = 0.0674283
*+ WARNING: Smallest FDR q [14 Safe_Event#6_Tstat] = 0.999607 ==> few true single voxel detections
++ Smallest FDR q [16 Threat_Event#0_Tstat] = 0.0159932
++ Smallest FDR q [18 Threat_Event#1_Tstat] = 3.96124e-13
++ Smallest FDR q [20 Threat_Event#2_Tstat] = 2.88505e-13
++ Smallest FDR q [22 Threat_Event#3_Tstat] = 2.2296e-11
++ Smallest FDR q [24 Threat_Event#4_Tstat] = 0.00137936
*+ WARNING: Smallest FDR q [26 Threat_Event#5_Tstat] = 0.499351 ==> few true single voxel detections
*+ WARNING: Smallest FDR q [28 Threat_Event#6_Tstat] = 0.998364 ==> few true single voxel detections
...
...
*+ WARNING: Smallest FDR q [58 Error#0_Tstat] = 0.369846 ==> few true single voxel detections
++ Smallest FDR q [60 Error#1_Tstat] = 6.92002e-06
++ Smallest FDR q [62 Error#2_Tstat] = 4.96789e-05
++ Smallest FDR q [64 Error#3_Tstat] = 4.85749e-09
++ Smallest FDR q [66 Error#4_Tstat] = 7.30766e-11
++ Smallest FDR q [68 Error#5_Tstat] = 5.37639e-07
*+ WARNING: Smallest FDR q [70 Error#6_Tstat] = 0.898169 ==> few true single voxel detections
*+ WARNING: Smallest FDR q [72 Feedback#0_Tstat] = 0.113155 ==> few true single voxel detections
++ Smallest FDR q [74 Feedback#1_Tstat] = 7.62961e-11
++ Smallest FDR q [76 Feedback#2_Tstat] = 2.65427e-13
++ Smallest FDR q [78 Feedback#3_Tstat] = 4.48428e-13
++ Smallest FDR q [80 Feedback#4_Tstat] = 1.51898e-05
++ Smallest FDR q [82 Feedback#5_Tstat] = 0.000253691
*+ WARNING: Smallest FDR q [84 Feedback#6_Tstat] = 0.641075 ==> few true single voxel detections
Reply Quote
RSS
Subject Author Posted

Are these alarms problematic?

Juan December 13, 2020 02:44PM

Re: Are these alarms problematic?

gang December 14, 2020 07:58AM

Re: Are these alarms problematic?

Juan December 15, 2020 10:39AM