AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
March 03, 2021 12:26PM
Good afternoon pt,


Thank you so much for looking into the questions. Below are my responses.

-AFNI version ("afni -ver")?
Precompiled binary macos_10.12_local: Jan 18 2021 (Version AFNI_21.0.04 'Titus')

-One first thing to note about your afni_proc.py command the QC: using "-html_review_style pythonic"
I actually have this line of code in my afni_proc.py. I accidently omitted the line while copy-pasting. The QC-report I mentioned previously was generated via this line of code, and in the report, the “qc_10_regr_grayplot.jpg” file is not being generated correctly. I can see the enorm plots just fine when I run the @ssreview_driver.

-Re. Q3 (because you did sneak a third question in!)(<= I know.. I did!)
Thank you so much for the explanation. It all makes sense now, and I will look to see how to use the line of code. Running the SSWarper before afni_proc.py makes a lot of sense indeed.

-Re. Q1: There should be a file called "out.review_html" in your *.results directory from afni_proc.py. That contains a log of all the APQC (afni_proc.py QC) generation. Could you email me that?
Will email right away after posting this.

Re. Q2: That Xmat failure is odd... I am not sure---that is probably a Rick-level question, and I will ping him.
Actually, Ann, what is your final degree of freedom (DF) count?
initial DF                   : 890 : 100.0%

DF used for regs of interest :   0 :   0.0%
DF used for censoring        :   0 :   0.0%
DF used for polort           :  14 :   1.6%
DF used for motion           :  24 :   2.7%
DF used for ROIPC            :   6 :   0.7%
DF used for bandpass         : 564 :  63.4%
total DF used                : 608 :  68.3%

final DF                     : 282 :  31.7%
Subject Author Posted

QC output question

annschoe March 02, 2021 03:58PM

Re: QC output question

ptaylor March 03, 2021 10:09AM

Re: QC output question

ptaylor March 03, 2021 11:24AM

Re: QC output question

annschoe March 03, 2021 12:26PM

Re: QC output question

ptaylor March 03, 2021 12:39PM

Re: QC output question

annschoe March 03, 2021 12:52PM

Re: QC output question

rick reynolds March 03, 2021 03:30PM

Re: QC output question

annschoe March 03, 2021 03:44PM

Re: QC output question

rick reynolds March 03, 2021 04:21PM

Re: QC output question

annschoe March 03, 2021 07:45PM

Re: QC output question

rick reynolds March 04, 2021 09:43AM

Re: QC output question

rick reynolds March 04, 2021 02:43PM

Re: QC output question

annschoe March 04, 2021 03:29PM