AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

Previous Message Next Message
Message List New Topic Print View
|
mjss
October 16, 2021 06:34PM
Hi Rick,

Thank you for these clarifications, I understand much better now. If the number of TRs per stim are based on stimulus response timing/BOLD response curves and therefore don't reflect the actual timing of each task condition, is there a way estimate how much actual scanning time has been censored per task condition?

Thank you,

Michael
Reply Quote
RSS
Subject Author Posted

discrepancy with number of censored outlier TRs in afni_proc.py output

mjss October 14, 2021 01:57PM

Re: discrepancy with number of censored outlier TRs in afni_proc.py output

rick reynolds October 14, 2021 05:58PM

Re: discrepancy with number of censored outlier TRs in afni_proc.py output

mjss October 16, 2021 06:34PM

Re: discrepancy with number of censored outlier TRs in afni_proc.py output

rick reynolds October 16, 2021 07:36PM

Re: discrepancy with number of censored outlier TRs in afni_proc.py output

mjss October 18, 2021 10:48AM