AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
March 21, 2022 06:58PM
The grid of the output in align_epi_anat.py is controlled by the -master_xxx options. If you are using giant_move or ginormous_move, the grid is set to be on the base's grid but with the isotropic resolution of the minimum dimension of the input dataset by default. The master options override any of the defaults, and you get the grid on the output you want. I think in this case, the dataset moved forward a bit with the alignment but stayed in the same grid location (no giant_move), and that removed the anterior portion. If you use the other dataset as the master, then you would get the full coverage at the cost of empty voxels. If you know that the aligned dataset only needs a few extra slices, you can make one with 3dZeropad, and that can be your target grid. You may also apply the affine transformation with 3dWarp, which moves the dataset and automatically computes the grid that fits if no gridset option is used.
Subject Author Posted

align_epi_anat cropping Attachments

Pawel March 18, 2022 02:07PM

Re: align_epi_anat cropping

Daniel Glen March 21, 2022 06:58PM

Re: align_epi_anat cropping

Pawel March 22, 2022 10:59AM

Re: align_epi_anat cropping

Daniel Glen March 22, 2022 11:03PM