AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
March 09, 2023 09:00AM
Refering to this question again:

Quote
As I understand it now, the general approach is as follows:
-regress_polort DEGREE: generally the better approach to better preserve DOF. It also takes care of slow scanner drift impacts etc.
-regress_bandpass x y: might be required in certain cases, like in my case when computing the autocorrelation.


I am still interested in your opinion, especially if -regress_polort takes care of scanner noise etc. in frequencies below 0.01 Hz, so that -regress_bandpass is normally not required to exclude the former.
Subject Author Posted

General questions regarding AFNI proc's bandpass option

Philipp February 28, 2023 07:52AM

Re: General questions regarding AFNI proc's bandpass option

ptaylor February 28, 2023 09:02AM

Re: General questions regarding AFNI proc's bandpass option

Philipp February 28, 2023 11:53AM

Re: General questions regarding AFNI proc's bandpass option

Philipp March 09, 2023 09:00AM