AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
April 25, 2023 09:45AM
Hello,

May I ask for your recommendation on the appropriate time resolution to use when preparing a task timing file?

In our case, event onsets and durations are defined based on concurrent EEG recordings, and their time resolution is rounded to 0.1 seconds. Should I use this resolution directly when preparing the timing 1D file, or is it better to align them to the TR grid? My understanding is that, in AFNI the basis functions are treated as continuous. Therefore, the task regressor is sampled at the TR resolution after convolving the event and basis function at a much higher resolution.

If this is correct and TR=2 seconds, is it still better to use BOLCK(0.2, 1) instead of BOLCK(1, 1), even if the difference of the final generated regressors may be negligible?

If I would like to use duration modulation dmUBLOCK(x) and x is calculated by the median of all durations, I guess it is not necessary to round x?

Thanks,
Zhengchen
Subject Author Posted

Temporal resolution in event timing 1D file

Zhengchen Cai April 25, 2023 09:45AM

Re: Temporal resolution in event timing 1D file

rick reynolds April 25, 2023 04:17PM

Re: Temporal resolution in event timing 1D file

Zhengchen Cai April 26, 2023 09:46AM