AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
January 07, 2003 03:33PM
Our long runs are rooted in large data sets as opposed to any particular module being inefficient. The longer running modules have tended to be motion correction/image registration, deconvolution, and some of the stats. If the goal is to run this in near realtime, it might still be necessary to look at all the typical steps including things like temporal and spacial smoothing even though they rarely are major time consumers. (Besides - they look pretty easy to do :) )

Having read ahead in this thread, if we used MPI and ifdef'ed the calls in,
it would be benign to the traditional single CPU AFNI user community, and yet be portable to clusters, SMP systems, and massively parallel machines. MPI is a widely adopted de facto standard for this kind of processing. That would also leave the door open for future work to support grids. MPI is a message passing interface as well as a control stucture, so the "embarrassingly parallel" and the more complex fine grained parallelism can both be handled.
Subject Author Posted

Parallelizing AFNI

Dave Ramsey January 07, 2003 03:33PM

Re: Parallelizing AFNI

bob cox January 07, 2003 03:56PM

Re: Parallelizing AFNI

Dave Ramsey January 07, 2003 05:10PM